Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
British Journal of Infection Control
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhojani, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Hand hygiene: "Simple, inexpensive and an effective tool"

S. Bhojani

Darent Valley Hospital, Darenth Wood, Dartford, Kent DA2 8DA, bhojani_sheetal{at}yahoo.com

S. D'Costa

Darent Valley Hospital, Kent

A. Gupta

Darent Valley Hospital, Kent

Hospital acquired infection severely affects patients, prolongs hospital stays and presents a major challenge for quality of patients' care (Emmerson et al, 1996; Hand washing Liaison Group, 1999). Improvement in hand hygiene can help in reduction of hospital acquired infection (Hand washing Liaison Group, 1999; Kilpatrick et al, 2007; Whitby et al, 2007; Duerink et al, 2006; Sohn et al, 2005; Jumaa 2005; Randle et al, 2006). Three observational audits were carried out to ascertain existing hand hygiene practice. In the first audit, prescribed standards were achieved in only 29% of cases. After appropriate educational interventions, a repeat study after three months showed significant improvement in up to 84% of cases. The final audit, eight months after the second study, showed that although consultants and registrars had maintained high standards (90%), senior house officers' (SHOs) practice deteriorated (46%). Although both SHOs and registrars changed during this period, only SHO performance deteriorated. Possible reasons may be either that SHOs need more education, or that because they have a busier workload, omission is more common among them, but, this requires more exploration.

Conclusion: Hand hygiene is a simple but important practice. Repeat audits plus education appears to drive up standards.

Recommendations: To achieve desirable and sustained behaviour change, there is a need to present information on hand hygiene to all doctors at regular intervals. Regular but random covert surveillance observation of practice with a professionals' prior consent appeared to assist in improving practice in this study.

Key Words: Hand hygiene • compliance • infection control

British Journal of Infection Control, Vol. 9, No. 5, 15-17 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1469044608092806


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?