This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bahal, A. Articles by McLaws, M.L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Hand hygiene compliance: universally better post-contact than pre-contact in healthcare workers in the UK and Australia

Bellevue Medical Centre, 6 Bellevue, Edgbaston, Birmingham B5 7LX

D. Karamchandani

University of Birmingham Medical School. Contact: City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham B18 7QH

A.P. Fraise

Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH

M.L. McLaws

Hospital Infection Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052

Objective: To establish whether post-patient contact hand hygiene practice is universally higher than pre-patient contact in two highly resourced countries.

Methods: Observations of medical and nursing staffs' hand hygiene compliance were made by the same observers in two different hospitals in Sydney and Birmingham, in both intensive care units (ICU) and surgical wards, using a standardised data collection tool. Results: Hand hygiene rates pre- and post-patient contact were low for both nurses and doctors in Sydney and Birmingham, with the exception of Sydney ICU doctors (pre-contact 74.8% and post-contact 75.7%, p=0.868). Post-contact compliance was low but significantly better than pre-contact in Sydney ICU nurses (41.3% versus 59.6% p<0.0001), surgical ward nurses (14.9% versus 29.6%, p=0.0019) and Sydney surgeons (10.2% versus 30.2%, p<0.0001). Post-contact compliance rates were low but higher than pre-contact in Birmingham ICU nurses (33.1% versus 52.2%, p=0.0011) and doctors (29.3% versus 70.1%, p<0.0001) but not in the Birmingham surgical ward (nurses: 42.6% versus 43.4%, p=0.89; surgeons: 39.6% versus 48.4%, p=0.187). Handwashing on removal of gloves was extremely low (1.7% to 16.6%), regardless of city, specialties or clinical staff.

Conclusion: The pattern of post-contact compliance and non-compliance associated with glove use strongly suggests hand hygiene practice in both countries is primarily self-protective rather than a patient safety centred practice.

Key Words: Hand • hygiene • behaviour • compliance • ICU • nurses • doctors • patient safety

British Journal of Infection Control, Vol. 8, No. 1, 24-28 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/14690446070080011001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?