Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Infection Prevention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lomas, G.
Right arrow Articles by McNulty, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Identifying key factors that affect care home catheterisation rates: changing practice through audit

GM Lomas

Health Protection Agency, Primary Care Unit, Microbiology Department, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road Gloucester Gl1 3NN, UK, gemma.lomas{at}hpa.org.uk

R. Howell-Jones

Health Protection Agency, Centre For Infections, HIV & STI Department, Colindale, London, UK

CAM McNulty

Health Protection Agency, Primary Care Unit, Microbiology Department, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital

Urinary catheterisation in care homes is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Catheterisation rates in English care homes can vary significantly, yet the cause of these variations remains unclear. The authors approached 114 randomly selected care homes (3,190 residents) in the health district of Gloucestershire, England. A postal questionnaire survey was used to determine the number of catheters per care home and where residents' catheters were first acquired. There was a wide range of urinary catheterisation prevalence between homes, with some homes having no catheterised residents and one home with a prevalence of 47%. The majority of care home residents acquired catheters as hospital in-patients (57%), prior to care home admission. The authors suggest that patients discharged from hospital with a urinary catheter need a catheter care plan stating the reason for catheter insertion, and plans for review and removal. There is a need for ongoing local audits in primary and secondary care to determine how many patients are being discharged with unnecessary urinary catheters.

Key Words: Care homes • urinary catheterisation • community • elderly • guidance • questionnaire • audit

Journal of Infection Prevention, Vol. 10, No. 2, 66-69 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1757177408098142


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?